If you’re involved in civil litigation, you’ve probably heard about the new Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC) regime for the Intermediate Track. These changes, which came into effect on October 1, 2023, are shaking up the way we handle cases valued between £25,000 and £100,000. But what does this mean for you and your clients? Let’s dive into the battle lines, the uncertainties, and what we still need to know.
The New Intermediate Track: What's Changed?
The introduction of the Intermediate Track aims to streamline the litigation process and control legal costs. Under this regime, fixed costs are predetermined for each stage of the litigation process, making it easier to predict expenses and manage cases efficiently. This is a significant shift from the previous system, where costs could vary widely depending on the complexity and duration of the case.
Battle Lines: Where Are the Tensions?
One of the biggest concerns with the new FRC regime is the balance between proportionality and the quality of representation. With costs capped, there’s a risk that solicitors may be less willing to take on complex cases or invest the necessary time and resources to achieve the best outcomes for their clients. This could lead to a “race to the bottom” in terms of service quality.
Another critical issue is access to justice. The capped costs may deter some solicitors from taking on cases that fall within the Intermediate Track, particularly if they involve significant risks or uncertainties. This could leave some claimants without the legal representation they need to pursue their claims effectively.
The new regime also impacts the use of experts. With fixed costs, there’s a greater emphasis on managing expenses, which could lead to a reduction in the use of expert witnesses. This raises concerns about the ability to present a robust case, particularly in complex matters where expert testimony is crucial.
Uncertainties in the System
One of the uncertainties in the new system is how cases will be banded based on their complexity. The Intermediate Track includes different bands, each with its own fixed costs, but there’s still some ambiguity about how cases will be classified and whether the banding will accurately reflect the complexity and demands of each case.
The introduction of fixed costs could also impact settlement negotiations. With costs predetermined, there may be less incentive for parties to settle early especially where there are not significant increases in cost between case phases. There can therefore be a calculated risk in allowing claims to proceed and the Claimant Part 36 offer does not bite as hard as in previous regimes.
As with any significant change, there’s always a period of adjustment. The legal community is still grappling with the practicalities of implementing the new FRC regime and ensuring compliance with the new rules. This includes understanding the nuances of the fixed costs tables and navigating the procedural changes.
Difficulties with Costs in Cases Involving Vulnerable Parties
One of the most challenging aspects of the new FRC regime is how it handles cases involving vulnerable parties. Vulnerable parties may include individuals with physical or mental disabilities, those who have experienced trauma, or those with language or communication difficulties.
The new rules do allow for an increase in FRC where a party or witness is vulnerable and this vulnerability has required additional work to be undertaken. However, to argue for such an increase, the amount of additional work done must be at least 20% greater than the amount of fixed recoverable costs. This can be a significant hurdle, as it requires detailed documentation and justification of the additional work and costs incurred.
Moreover, there is a concern that a judge will only make a decision about a person’s vulnerability later in the case, after the additional costs have already been incurred. This creates uncertainty for solicitors around recoverability and, if additional costs are not awarded, could lead to an inequality in the system, where vulnerable parties have higher client contributions.
How This May Affect Claimants in the Future
For claimants, the new FRC regime brings both opportunities and challenges. On the positive side, the predictability of fixed costs can make it easier for claimants to understand the potential financial implications of pursuing a claim. This transparency can help claimants make more informed decisions about whether to proceed with litigation.
However, there are also potential downsides. The capped costs may limit the willingness of solicitors to take on more complex or high-risk cases, which could leave some claimants without the legal representation they need. This is particularly concerning for claimants with cases that require extensive expert testimony or significant legal resources.
Additionally, the emphasis on controlling costs could impact the quality of representation. Solicitors may be less inclined to invest time and resources into cases if they know their fees are capped. This could lead to a reduction in the thoroughness and quality of legal work, potentially affecting the outcomes for claimants.
Looking ahead, it’s crucial for the legal community to monitor the impact of the new FRC regime on claimants and advocate for adjustments as needed. Ensuring that claimants have access to high-quality legal representation and fair compensation should remain a top priority.
Wrapping it Up
The introduction of Fixed Recoverable Costs in the Intermediate Track is a significant change that aims to make the litigation process more predictable and cost-effective. However, it also brings challenges and uncertainties that need to be navigated carefully. By staying informed and adapting to the new regime, we can ensure that our clients receive the best possible representation and outcomes.
The Motor Accident Solicitors Society
The Motor Accident Solicitors Society is a membership organisation for road traffic accident claims experts. As a non-profit organisation formed in 1991, we’re widely known as the expert voice on all matters relating to RTA claims.
Our members widely benefit from this high profile not only through recognition of their expertise, but also from the important role that MASS plays within the RTA/PI claims industry.
If you’re a law firm dedicated to representing road traffic accident victims, aligning with MASS is essential. Since 1991, we’ve set the gold standard in expertise, ethical practice and efficiency.
Don’t just be a solicitor; be a part of a movement. Join MASS, where your expertise meets our commitment to set precedents and drive justice.
“Navigating The Battle Lines: Fixed Recoverable Costs In The Intermediate Track” is a MASS original blog, first publihsed on Friday 31st January 2025, written by Darren Wilson, Legal Director – Paralegal, for Irwin Mitchell, a MASS member solicitors firm.